Dfc09
I think it would take a major restructuring to society to work, one that… Can’t pass anytime soon. Think Star Trek’s “post scarcity” environment. Everything we’d ever need is so easily and cheaply available from the result of automated manufacturing, mining, farming. In my mind, we’d have to hit this critical mass where such a small portion of the population is necessary to run the maintenance and development of these automated systems that it’s impossible for most people to have a job that “contributes” to society. There’s no way, in that situation, we could just… Let the population starve because they have no money, even though the infrastructure exists to support all their needs and more for free.
UBI, in that case, would just be “spending money” to supplant the free food, power, housing, and clothing everybody already receives. Society would be more focused on socializing, exploring hobbies, art, etc. Only the people who really want more money or something else to fill their time with would get jobs, be STEM or government or something. I don’t see capitalism happily coexisting with UBI. Capitalism inherently depends on people needing to pay their bills to stay alive.
It depends how you define reality working consistently. Dark matter was first theorized by observing how galaxies and star clusters etc don’t seem to have enough mass to produce the gravitational footprint that holds them together. So dark matter was theorized to account for it. Invisible, intangible matter that only interacts with “normal” matter through gravity. Kinda strange 🤔
I was just thinking about my 16 hour flight back to CONUS from a deployment a few weeks back. We flew in uniform, uncomfortable as fuck, all I did was put one headphone in and listen to an audiobook while staring at the in-flight map. Even after a few weeks back in the states I don’t think I could do that again, but I was still riding the deployment mindset of “sit and stare at the wall til I have to do something”
Super interesting read. Points out that the main strategy for gobbling up open source protocols is to adopt the standard, then expand on it, creating a “better” version for those using their ecosystem (and driving out those who aren’t)
I just wonder, hope, that this ecosystem stays innovative and big enough to always be better than corporate alternatives. We’ve sorta hit the point in my mind where the major players in social media have made all their products… Awful. Just terrible to be on. The tracking, the ridiculous amounts and types of ads, the constant censorship and rule > changes, all in pursuit of monetization. I just hope they continue to shoot themselves in the foot too much to draw people back in even if they’re federated. Reddit sucks now, Twitter is failing, everything of Meta has sucked for a long time. Hopefully people agree moving forward that open source replacements are good enough and being enough benefits to push these turds out. I’m sick of the internet being controlled by massive corporations.
The grabbing close coming in for the attack
I’m a US army infantry, I don’t have a great overall picture of geopolitics, but I’m generally a pretty anti-war kind of guy. My personal take is that while we’ve mixed ourselves up in a lot of deplorable wars, we also get utilized a LOT to prevent large threats from brewing in the first place. I just spent the last year on a NATO peacekeeping mission, and my job was 100% “be visible so Russian backed actors can’t operate openly”
So no, we haven’t fought wars that directly expelled hostile armies from our territory. But we do project a strong presence in dark corners that further the goals of stability for the US and Western Europe. By the way, NATO is mostly the US armed forces, other countries supply token, under equipped forces. That’s changing recently due to Russia’s aggression, but most of Western Europe was completely dependent on US NATO forces to maintain peace.