Avatar

Frato

Frato@lemmy.ml
Joined
4 posts • 26 comments

Let’s cooperate!

Direct message
6 points
*

Sure, systemd does what it is supposed to do. It is NOT bad design from the admins perspective, but from a os-architecture perspective. It is a huge single binary with a huge number of 0-day exploits (you can check those). The scale of the projects causes many possible exploits. A set of small programs, which do only one thing, is easier to maintain (^= decentralization of os-design)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
  1. There is not a scientific proof YET, but i think it can be done: for that we would need to program the “corner-stone”, which would be the *nix-program #1 - something that could show practically what the pioneers of the *nix system envisioned. This practical proof is possible, if we deep dive into the POSIX definition to analyze for what it was made.

  2. unix is a trademark, but what counts is the architectural vision behind it (D. Richie&co.) I think it would be better to avoid the tradmarked word (sry for using it) - *nix may be a proper word (although it implies that it is a whole group)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

or: cp my.iso /dev/sdaX

(much faster than dd)

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

It’s bad design and therfore a wrong standard. Also, it’s a security desaster.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

the *nix system up to the shell enviroment needs to be clean, libre and true to the vision - everything beyond may be. … whatever…

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

I think the init system matters A LOT! Systemd is anti-unix-style and making it a “new default” and forcing it, by depending on it, is breaking the best os-design there is: the unix-like system. (who changes it will be forced to reinvent it…better stay close to the original vision in the first place)

permalink
report
reply

If you’re into kernel hacking, you may consider supporting the HyperbolaBSD project, which seems much more promising than hurd.

permalink
report
reply
2 points
*

Hyperbola has the best vision for a clean and libre general-OS.

Yes, they very strict about the interpretation of “libre”, but that makes the vision pure and crystal clear.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

nevermind, parabola is a great distro (with openrc version), but hyperbola will not draw dev-power from pb, because it will be a completly own breed. Yes the existing BSD’s are great, but none of them are fsf conform.

The effort of the hb-bsd will produce OSS that can synergize with all the projects you named.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

made me smile, have an upvote 😉

permalink
report
parent
reply