Avatar

Professional-Bug2305B

Professional-Bug2305@alien.top
Joined
0 posts • 21 comments
Direct message

Not without alot of messing around, I’d just stick with 2.5.

permalink
report
reply

You can go down to literally a usb stick or even micros card if they support it. Esxi works on an SD card with a few config tweaks.

permalink
report
reply

No, everyone needs a Colo datacenter’s worth of hardware in their moist basement

permalink
report
parent
reply

Proxmox is the best option here

permalink
report
reply

They’re paid to get It working, not make it pretty. Most of those guys don’t make any real money after expenses. The more they do, they more they earn.

permalink
report
reply

Just use zfs within proxmox, only reason you’d do disk passthrough to vm would be if you’re using esxi and want to use zfs still.

permalink
report
reply
  1. Router type literally doesn’t matter.
  2. Windows server can absolutely get dhcp address
  3. You can’t remote into Nas hardware as they don’t have a desktop
  4. Play a bit more and explore these technologies in your own home first, or. You’ll have a huge headache waiting to happen.
permalink
report
reply

Skip the pi’s

Grab a refurb mini pc off of amazon and max out the ram, and install proxmox. Should have a nice little sandbox for under 150.

permalink
report
reply

Ah okay, I’d recommend softether as an option as it doesn’t technically NAT changes to put into place. (easier if you can, but can work without it)

permalink
report
parent
reply

Nas software is more friendly and just works. Windows doesn’t have a great raid option, but nas do. Windows desktop also has alot of artificial limits and is less stable and will reboot for patches at inconvenient times.

I simplest terms, it’s like use a flat screw driver on a Philips head. It’ll technically work, but there are just plain better options that will work better and easier.

permalink
report
reply