RusAD
Yeah. There’s a lot of things that conservatives hate, that’s what I was saying since the beginning. And I didn’t even mention the hate of non-christians, for example, or for socialists.
And if you support some things but not the others, you’re still supporting policies based on hate, so my point stands
Well… if a conservative:
- supports gay marriage
- doesn’t believe in ROGD or the notion that people become transgender because of social contagion
- is okay with sex education that includes homosexuality
- supports transgender athletes
- supports transgender people using bathrooms according to their gender
- is okay with drag shows and doesn’t believe they’re automatically unsuitable for children
- doesn’t believe that people of color are inherently more violent/stupid/dangerous/filthy/etc
- supports schools in teaching even the unsightly parts of the country’s history
- supports immigration
- supports diversity and inclusion
- doesn’t believe that young people are lazy ungrateful brats
- doesn’t support patriarchy
- defends women’s rights to abortion
- believes that government should spend more money on helping homeless, drug addicts, disabled, orphans, etc
Is this person still a conservative?
A “hallmark sign” of having gender dysphoria is persistent identification with or insistence on being the opposite sex for at least a period of six months. And “not everyone who is questioning their gender ends up being trans” is not a statement anyone would argue with.
And no, confusion does imply being wrong. I rarely if ever saw it used as a short-hand for “not having an answer”. It usually means either “fail to understand” (e.g. “I’m confused, is the birthday on the 5th or on the 15th?”) or “made a mistake” (e.g. “Oh, sorry, I confused you for a friend of mine”). The term you’re looking for is “questioning their gender” or “exploring their gender identity”.