fedidude

I feel you. The amount of my life spent getting these low quality results was… educational

I too am an appreciator of thicc lasses and I admire that you went for a very specific subject and style. I also appreciate that in your negative you put some effort into stopping the odd skin spots… but that’s the worst advert I’ve seen for NG_DeepNegative_V1_75T. If you are determined to hand-craft I find sometimes the model responds well to ‘dirt’ as a negative. Alternatively, and at the risk of making it all our work looking super-generic, BadDream, UnrealisticDream and bad-artist may be worth a try.

Ah, yeah makes perfect sense then. This was throwing a dart and hitting triple-20 three times. Change the dartboard and… We expect determinism, we get whatever this is.

Not discouraging, just being real. This gen is special because it is so insanely rare. If any rando could stick a banana to a wall and call it art then… oh, nvm. It could be that a1111 treats the random gen differently than comfyui? I have been in this game long enough (and written my own Mersenne Twister) to know that what you are asking for is extremely hard for the developers to achieve without an exact match of the software stack. No disrespect, this is just hard AF.

Thanks dude, I appreciate my first positive comment coming from a fellow creator!

I trust you know since you’re pro-adjacent that the meta-beauty of a ‘pure’ prompt-derived image (no inpainting to fix fingers) is that with a few downloads and some copy-pasta you can recreate exactly the same art and rework it at will. If I steal all of the world’s artist’s and author’s IP for shts and giggles I feel ethically bound to at least share the exact, true and replicable shtngiggle-making process. IDK why, maybe it’s the scientist in me.