immortaly007

Will ungoogled chromium be able to patch this out?

Beside this, I’m still a bit worried about the state of the internet. Currently, ad revenue is what keeps a lot of sites online/free to use. Within the current economic system, is it even feasible to have privacy online?

In that case, I’ll think I’ll just stay on the NewPipe/SmartTube/Revanced/adblock route for now

Is that trick “safe” for your Google account? I wouldn’t mind paying for yt premium, but it’s really not worth 7€ a month to me. Maximum half of that.

I tend to wear Ecco’s (not crazy expensive ones, more in the 120-150€ range). I quite like them in terms of being strong and looking good enough. But I think they last me about 2-3 years.

Really good suggestions already (Meshuggah, Spiritbox etc). But this list is not complete without: Rage against the machine - Bullet in the head, wake up, testify, sleep now in the fire. All great!

Brandon Sanderson is always a good recommendation

I do see the other way around as well. So the games don’t get updated and then don’t support newer versions of Android. I see the same with RCT Classic.

In the end, I decided that if I’m gonna buy new RAM for this server, I might as well take the opportunity and upgrade the motherboard and CPU as well.

I went with an i3-13100 (with IGPU) on a Asrock B760M-ITX/D4 motherboard. I also added an m2 SSD and 32GB of RAM forugood measure.

Well the judges are currently reviewing the evidence, so at best, the proof is not public yet. Suffice to say the prosecutors claim he appeared to be running a sex trafficking ring (https://www.reuters.com/world/romania-detains-ex-kickboxer-andrew-tate-human-trafficking-case-2022-12-30/). Which very often contains countless cases of rape.

He also “proudly” says he’s a misogynist, woman are weak, etc (https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-64125045). This its not something non-rapists tend to say.

I agree for serious/business applications. In my case, it’s a home server that I and some close friends and family access. But it is indeed exposed (basically, my router routes port 80 and 443 to the server within the NAT).

To discuss the header-based firewall: the host is used by Traefik to determine which docker container to route (reverse proxy) the traffic to. So I don’t see any obvious ways an attacker can really manipulate that to reach (in my case) the bitwarden instance. My main attack angle this protects if is there is some vulnerability in Bitwarden and bots are going around exploiting that. That way at least Traefik would already block them before they get to bitwarden.

But yes another service with a vulnerability could be exploited, then escape that docker container and you’re in the whole server.