User's banner
Avatar

__หฃ๐™†๐™Š๐™Ž๐˜ผ๐™ˆ๐˜ผหฃ__ :dunno:

kosama@socel.net
Joined
0 posts โ€ข 19 comments

A web programmer and self-proclaimed artist who lives in Los Angeles. I sometimes dabble in the arts of cooking, drawing, gaming, youtubeing, musicing, and just about anythinging.

That should cover it.

Direct message

@Art3sian Iโ€™ll never forget when I had to tap the โ€œXโ€ on Twitterrificโ€ฆ Soon Iโ€™ll do the same to Apolloโ€ฆ
(๏ฝกล๏นล)

permalink
report
reply

@Umbrias @Jamoke is that even planned for ActivityPub? I think the cross communication is so that you can participate without necessarily making accounts Mastodon, Peertube, Lemmy, Misskey, etc.

If you need main features youโ€™d likely need a account, similar to getting access to post creation and upvote/downvote on Lemmy sites.

permalink
report
parent
reply

@Mojo @KahunaDaKine on the same page, was initially bummed out my account didnโ€™t get approved, guess my answer was poo lol. But then I remembered I can use my Mastodon account to comment. I just canโ€™t create post or downvote them.
Favoriting counts as a upvote though.

So Iโ€™m basically a lurker now lmfao! (ส˜โ€ฟส˜)

permalink
report
parent
reply

@nope it wasnโ€™t necessarily that I wanted a 3rd Party Client, I just enjoyed Twitter through Twitterific as it had features I liked. Butโ€ฆ as time went on Twitter toxicity was impossible to escape, almost like walking on eggshells. Eventually just using it to argue and defend myself, so Iโ€™m actually quite happy with the alternative. I follow artists through their major avenues since most arenโ€™t on here. Iโ€™m just not actively commenting on those platforms or posting my content anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply

@beatniak @blank_sl8 recently many yt-dlp User Interfaces stopped working, I couldnโ€™t download certain videos. So maybe the cat and mouse is about to begin.

permalink
report
parent
reply

@rbos @EverlastongOS thatโ€™s the only thing I donโ€™t understand. If itโ€™s lifetime sub, how do they fund their costs from your usage after?

Host providers donโ€™t have a one-time payment lifetime subscription for bandwidth usage. Eventually you will surpass the bandwidth cost of your lifetime sub and theyโ€™d be losing money keeping you. Something doesnโ€™t feel right.

permalink
report
parent
reply

@b_n
For me, it boils down to this: relying solely on cash injections to scale up seems short-sighted. Bandwidth costs are often underestimated, especially for high-quality video streaming. If usersโ€™ lifetime costs outweigh bandwidth expenses, the injection could turn into a liability. Iโ€™m concerned about the sustainability of their model. Unlike a ski-lift company that generates revenue from various sources (food, merch, rentals).

Maybe my hosting knowledge is just too old school.

permalink
report
parent
reply

@rbos yea, that sounds similar to what a lot of these monopolistic internet companies do. But eventually the bill is due.

If they canโ€™t scale up with what they got, then maybe it isnโ€™t profitable. But what Iโ€™m understanding is that theyโ€™re using โ€œLifetime Usersโ€ as a gamble to grow.

hmmmโ€ฆ maybe I just donโ€™t like private infrastructure, but Iโ€™m at odds with this model. But if the users understand that the bubble can burst, then I wish them luck.

permalink
report
parent
reply