mikeyBoy14

On the other hand, Google/Apple Pay are both pretty great products that replace a horrendous legacy payments system. Recall that for like 40 years the most innovative consumer payment system looked like this. And it was essentially a duopoly as well (Visa/Mastercard).

At the end of the day, cash is still a thing as well.

Man, Lemmy is savage with its downvotes.

And also stop goes for hikes in the middle of a heat wave.

how many interpretations and how much logic can there actually be?

At least two interpretations, per the above discussion.

This thread feels like reddit all over again, and that’s not a good thing.

Agreed. I think it’s the upvote/downvote system. It’s an inherently flawed way to facilitate good faith discussions.

Christ man all I did was point out that the comic’s internal logic was an awkward fit for its theme.

I love the irony of a subreddit against religion trying to collectively reinforce that there is only one true interpretation of a comic. And discrediting contrary viewpoints without addressing the underlying logic.

We’re an odd species, aren’t we?

I think my interpretation is quite reasonble, given the presentation.

But the scientist and the religious person are shown to be identical, and the first row showed that he could fly. I.e., the claim that he refused to prove was implied to be true, regardless of his refusal to prove it.

Since he can actually fly, this implies that his religious beliefs are true…

Edit: I love the irony of a subreddit against religion trying to collectively reinforce that there is only one true interpretation of a comic.