pissedatyall

That’s fucking rich…

It certainly is. You forget what party has tried to push single-payer healthcare, unions, higher taxes for the rich and diplomatic solutions to world issues…like, for decades. But it’s either the republicans and their block voting blocking anything or those who want everything now and no smaller steps will suffice (whether large swaths of the country support or even understand it). It’s all or nothing, and you’re still surprised that when you don’t support any efforts, you get nothing.

Your hate does not make you stronger. It just makes you blind.

I’m done with this ridiculous debate. G’bye and good luck to you.

Just because you want to make up new definitions doesn’t mean yours are right either, bucko.

The US is primarily centrist. Always has been. There’s liberal and conservative voices in that center as well. Then you have voices like progressives and arch-conservatives, pulling more to either side.

Your definition is a clear attempt to just muddy the waters by lying about who actually wants what.

Have you not been watching the House or Senate for the past 30 years? ANY political advantage is a tool, especially for the Republicans since they LOVE defunding parts of the the government they see as in the way (IRS, for example). Look at Moscow Marjorie and how shes happy to break the system until they get what they want (money for Israel if Ukraine gets it).

Yes - and they’re called Libertarians.

And what about MAGA? How’s that for anarchists?

Sarcasm is notoriously difficult to determine in text, as you well may know, hence the popular use of /s to denote that.

Then again, either you completely forget that this is the world wide web, not AOL-Online, and not everyone understanding and use of speech is the same, or you’re fully aware of that and are going in for a double-dip, for shits and giggles.

You tell me. /s

Nope, people who are to the LEFT of liberals

Might want to try the grammar on that again, Tex. I’ve been a liberal and have voted for Democrats since Carter, so don’t lecture me about US politics, especially as you can’t make a clear claim yourself.

If you think for a moment that just invading another country is a possibility, you’re insane. That would only make Netanyahu stronger; the goal is to weaken him and the entire right-wing of their government, and you can’t do that by invasion, or by cutting them off arbitrarily (that would cripple the US government).

Simplistic ideas don’t solve difficult problems. Hope that clears up any confusion.

I love conservatives. It’s always a race to the bottom with you people.

Conservatives wait until a system is rich and then dive in like locusts. I’m old enough to have watched over half a century of their global bullshit - I’ll stay and stick with liberals any day over a world of conservative rule.

I see someone is not familiar with the act of rhetorical exaggeration…

…and I see someone trolling.

They’re right - this is disingenuous bullshit.

Meh, junk…junk…jun—EXCALIBURRRR!