rdri

Yachts. This can’t be more silly. And what would you say if he didn’t own those yachts? “Look at the bank account of that guy who owns almost a whole gaming platform because others are not qualified enough to compete with his company”?

Government of which country or countries? You wouldn’t think they would stay in the US if what you said will happen, would you?

If they took 0.5 %,

Took from what? Is this about the revenue share again? Stop listening to that idiot Timmy.

We know that many others take the same %% so I could say even if they took 50% they wouldn’t deliver a product as good as Steam.

Valve just takes 10% more than everyone else

What do you mean? 30% is used by almost every digital store.

Because that leads to the degradation of the software? Or because they provide most of the valid feedback? Or because that would help more users become more advanced?

I don’t know what do you think I wanted. I wanted to understand what American people think. If they like to avoid hard answers, it seems very similar to avoiding necessary solutions (at this point it may seem I support violence but I don’t). The scenario is becoming bad but everyone seems fine just doing nothing, as if people lost the right to affect anything.

That didn’t answer my question.

This makes it sound like non-political violence is acceptable…

You said there are too many stupid users, then you said the software has to suit them. I see this as a problem when software targets stupid users because then the rest suffer from it being less convenient for them.

Also I think it’s hilarious how things become more complex for developers who should actually have the power to fork things in order to make them more suitable for advanced users. And apple is a good example of that. I would be a huge iphone fan if it wasn’t a walled garden in software terms.