You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
10 points

They’re not, but the old company logo was associated with a scandal/disaster so they changed it to distance themselves.

Idk if I really buy it considering how similar the new logo is, nobody is gonna think it’s two different companies. But I haven’t fully immersed myself in the conspiracy yet, so I might be missing some context

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

But none of this is true

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah, like I said, idk if I buy it. The explanation doesn’t really make sense.

But some really strange PR decisions have been made in the past.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Um deleting all evidence from the world except two supposed photos (which btw have different cornucopia designs) and a tiktok video… sounds like far more than anything a PR team could manage. All the three-letter agencies combined couldn’t pull that off, as the action itself would leave evidence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
0 points

But why do they deny the old logo existed?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

They don’t, because it’s made up.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Funny: Home of the Haha

!funny@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We’re all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

Community stats

  • 7.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.2K

    Posts

  • 24K

    Comments