You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
5 points

That’s interesting to me because the French use bread for basically every meal as well and in my mind it serves an equivalent cultural purpose, but they have so much variety it’s mind-boggling. Dark, light, using different grains, flours, shapes, temperatures, yeasts, … Pretty sure wars have been fought over disagreements on flour taste.

That a staple food like that wouldn’t have 1000 traditional variations sounds crazy to me. I think it makes complete sense that Europeans would see rice and think “OK now how many possible combinations are there?” because it’s just how we rationalize cooking.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Might have something to do with rice being a culture-wide staple and historically tended by an impoverished & exploited workforce — whereas breadmaking was more often lauded as an art form. 🤓

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I’m not knowledgeable enough about either to confirm or deny that theory, though I am reminded of the Answer in Progress episode about pasta that concluded that the incredible variety in pasta shapes is because making intricate pasta was a form of creative expression for women.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Different bread though can be made with the same ingredients in different combinations. So of course they’re was variety. Rice is grown as is. So unless a culture cultivated different species of rice which could take generations then they wouldn’t have multiple types or rice. Different styles of bread could be made with very little extra effort and some probably even happened by accident. It doesn’t take multiple generations to produce a new type of bread.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

There are plenty of both wheat and rice species though. It’s not like China has been eating rice for millennia without growing new kinds, modern rice and wheat are man-made plants anyway.

There is a looot of significance to the ingredients used for bread, and I don’t think it’s fair to say that rice is inherently not versatile.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m not down playing breads significance. I’m disagreeing with your implication that as a staple item rice is as easy to cultivate differences in as bread would be. You implied that when Europeans discovered rice they thought " wow there should be more kinds, we can make this more versitle" like the Asian people cultivating rice for centuries had missed the obvious unlike the bread inventing Europeans.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Dank Memes

!dankmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

This is the place to be on the interweb when Reddit irreversibly becomes a meme itself and implodes

If you are existing mods from r/dankmemes, you should be mod here too, kindly DM me on either platform

The many rules inherited from

  1. Be nice, don’t be not nice
  2. No Bigotry or Bullying
  3. Don’t be a dick!
  4. Censor any and all personal information from posts and comments
  5. No spam, outside links, or videos.
  6. No Metabaiting
  7. No brigading
  8. Keep it dank!
  9. Mark NSFW and spoilers appropriately
  10. NO REEEEEEE-POSTS!
  11. No shitposting
  12. Format your meme correctly. No posts where the title is the meme caption!
  13. No agenda posting!
  14. Don’t be a critic
  15. Karma threshold? What’s that?

Community stats

  • 561

    Monthly active users

  • 297

    Posts

  • 3.5K

    Comments