You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
9 points

Nice! I just checked Amtrak prices and it would be $180 for my wife and I to make a trip for probably $50-60 in gas.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

More money is spent each month on maintaining the roads in the United States than has ever been spent on passenger rail. If tax funding were reallocated away from roads towards trains the costs would reverse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Man, I’m not arguing for cars, I want trains to be a viable option! They just aren’t for a lot of people right now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

How is that possible? Trains are extremely cheap to run.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I would guess because Amtrak isn’t being subsidized enough. A lot of government money is spent on building and maintaining roads. If the consumer had to pay for that directly in the form of toll roads instead of through taxes then Amtrak would be much more competitive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I believe part of it too is that much of the rail infrastructure is owned by companies, and so Amtrak is getting permission from them to use their tracks. Freight trains get priority over Amtrak trains, for example, and I assume Amtrak has to pay for permission to use those rails.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You also have to take into account that they are buying tickets for 2 people whereas they only need to get gas for one car. If I do end up using AmTrak, I’m just one person so the gas price to ticket price ratio is one to one

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

capitalism

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Amtrak is government owned

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Correct me if I am wrong but isn’t like 100% of US rails owned by freight companies? And Amtrak must negotiate it’s prices for using them with each company whose track they want to use. This drives prices hella high.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Not 100%. Amtrak’s FY2022 fact sheet says that 72.6% of miles driven was on tracks owned by other railroads. That doesn’t tell us how much rail they own, but they do own some of their own rail.

Not only does it mean higher prices, but worse service because they have to rely on freight companies to maintain their rails properly and preference is given to freight leading to passenger delays.

Edit: Found a better source.

Ninety-seven percent of the route-miles traveled by Amtrak trains are on tracks owned by other railroads.

permalink
report
parent
reply

tumblr

!tumblr@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We’re all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don’t like a thing doesn’t mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.


Sister Communities:

Community stats

  • 2.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 590

    Posts

  • 15K

    Comments

Community moderators