You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
167 points

What does “human drivers of fire” mean?

permalink
report
reply
137 points

Well I’m here so I guess I’ll answer.

There are many human drivers of fire, the first and foremost being, well you know, lighting a fire. And boy, do humans light a lot of fires.

Take for example, here is a map of active fires around the globe, right now:

First order human drivers of fire are things we actively or accidentally do to light a fire. Ignition is a fundamental for fire to happen, and humans cause WAY more ignition events than nature does. Things like a cook fire, burning brush or downed debris for management purposes, infrastructure like power lines or fueling stations, car accidents, lit cigarettes being thrown out etc… etc… The timing and frequency of these events directly influence the frequency of fires.

Second order drivers are things like vegetation management, home placing and construction, and other biophysical drivers. For example, introduction of invasive species like bromus tectorum, which burns very readily, represents more fine fuels in the environment. Yadayadayada more fires. Other things around vegetation management would fall into this category, such as the suppression of fire, or the psychical thinning of fuels in forests, or prescribed burns.

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points
*

Well I’m here so I guess I’ll answer.

Are… are you McCarty et al., TropicalDingdong?

edit: !rimjobsteve@thiscommunitydoesntexistyet.poo

permalink
report
parent
reply
76 points

No no no, I’m an et al, just no any of those particular et al. I focus on wildfire risk and have read much on the topic. I’ve read McCarty and many more when it comes to understanding wildfire and wildfire risk. Some of my research focuses on wildfire risk, and spatial features as they relate to wildfire risk, so drivers becomes pretty important when it comes to wildfire risk modeling. I have taken several courses through NASA on the matter even though I don’t focus on drivers directly.

This is the kind of thing I’m working on:

The nodes are features, the edges are weights. In this case I’m just looking at structure:structure risk.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Thanks!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

…such as the suppression of fire, or the psychical thinning of fuels in forests, or prescribed burns.

I’m definitely picturing Jedi clearing debris from the forest floors using the Force, now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Take for example, here is a map of active fires around the globe, right now:

By “fires” do they mean fores fires? Controlled fires to burn crops, or burn land to clear it for crops? House fires? Bonfires? Campfires? Fires in fireplaces?

Ignition is a fundamental for fire to happen, and humans cause WAY more ignition events than nature does.

A car causes hundreds of ignition effects per minute. But, I’m guessing you mean a certain kind of ignition?

The timing and frequency of these events directly influence the frequency of fires.

The timing and frequency of things like lighting a fire directly influence the frequency of fires? Do you mean the frequency of out-of-control fires? Because otherwise that seems like a pretty obvious conclusion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Thank you so much for sharing something that you are passionate about. It was awesome to hear about, and I hope you continue to share the knowledge you have with others like myself. 😁

permalink
report
parent
reply
71 points

I use geospatial science and data to document, analyze, and predict complexities of wildland and human-caused fire, from individual to global scales. I have a particular interest in fire emissions and modeling, regional food security, land-cover/land-use change, and the Arctic. As a mom, I am concerned with helping children and future generations have better lives.

https://jmccartygeo.org/

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

This is my best guess without googling it or her.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

The only acceptable use of generative AI is to get the shit posts out faster

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I think it’s a great use, but not only.

Resume building, cover letters, aggregating open text responses, summarizing complex texts, and so on.

While the AI can’t be left alone to do these things and if you do it’ll be clear it’s AI but it can reduce the time to do them significantly.

I firmly believe this is like the age of the computer before it. Those who fail to become AI natives in knowledge work will become under employed or unemployed in 10-15 years.

So I encourage you to make an excuse to learn it and get good at it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

Those who are deemed “Lit” in academic language.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

It means she’s a trouble starter, punkin’ instigator, fear addicted, a danger illustrated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

So, you’re saying she’s a firestarter? Twisted firestarter?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

She’s the bitch you hated, filth infatuated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Probably just the totality of human influences on wildfires. This can include a wide range of activities and factors including climate change, forest preservation or cutting, changes in wild or domestic mammal herbivory, accidental ignition events, controlled burns, irrigation or diversion of streams, damming rivers, invasive species introductions, etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Found an article referencing McCarty as a “fire scientist” which is a really cool title. Seems like human drivers of fire is exactly what it sounds like, motivations and causes for why humans set fires.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

human drivers of fire is exactly what it sounds like

Dudes who drive flaming cars in stunt shows?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

It’s my new band name, that’s for sure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Something about climate change maybe?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Science Memes

!science_memes@mander.xyz

Create post

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.1K

    Posts

  • 74K

    Comments