OnStar reports location and speed data to the car manufacturer. Sometimes they will sell this data to insurance companies to raise your premium, as several news stores pointed out a few weeks ago. I couldn’t really find an advantage to OnStar, (I have my phone to call emergency services) so I disabled it by pulling it’s fuse.

For my 2019 bolt, it’s f31 in the instrument panel fuse box, just down and to the left of the steering wheel. The fuse box cover comes off when you pull it hard from the bottom.

I was able to find which fuse went to OnStar in the owners manual and labeled on the inside of the fuse box cover. You should be able to find it for your model car there too if it uses OnStar.

I did have the casualty of my speaker for calls and texts. I’m not able to use it right now. I’ll see if I can dig in and reconnect it somehow, but we’ll see.

Who knows that other into they’re snitching back to GM, or what they could do in the future, so I recommend disconnecting it. Good luck!

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
42 points

So if they’re charging more for bad drivers, they’ll charge less for good drivers, right?

If one company raises rates on bad drivers and uses the difference to offer lower rates to other drivers, they’ll get more customers.

permalink
report
reply
96 points

You should do stand-up, that was hilarious

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

It was downright adorable

permalink
report
parent
reply
-21 points

I literally started typing “please don’t reply if it’s just some knee-jerk response” then decided it wasn’t necessary. Yet here we are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Thanks for the thoughtful reply. I guess that’s essentially the hidden question in my original comment. “Is there enough healthy competition in the market that this will bring benefits to good drivers.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

No and even if there was, algorithmic price fixing leads the way. There is no free market force in insurance

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You’d think wouldn’t you!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The thing even some reporters who’re alarmed at this story like: usage-based insurance which does actually let people pay less if they’re provably safe. Safe, and/or low mileage. They also want drivers to be alerted when aggressive driving is detected to be given a chance to improve.

I think a program like that might be OK today for those who are very well informed about it. One day if every new car is web connected, I can imagine insurers trying to gouge anyone not in a driver monitoring program.

Such a privacy & liberty nightmare has a small silver lining I almost refuse to acknowledge: in a full-on Big Brother driving world, with human-expert-equivalent analysis of behavior, raging murderous drivers would certainly find it harder to do 100+ MPH with their lights off entering an active crosswalk while passing a schoolbus in the rain.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This turns out to be a bad thing. Enough people are uninformed or don’t care about their privacy that over time an option that doesn’t sell customer data loses customers and becomes more expensive and gets cancelled.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Right to Repair

!right2repair@discuss.tchncs.de

Create post

Whether it be electronics, automobiles or medical equipment, the manufacturers should not be able to horde “oem” parts, render your stuff useless if you repair it with aftermarket parts, or hide schematics of their products.

Summary article from I Fix It

Summary video by Marques Brownlee

Great channel covering and advocating right to repair, Lewis Rossman

Community stats

  • 277

    Monthly active users

  • 59

    Posts

  • 762

    Comments

Community moderators