You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context

Ok sure, but most people associate proprietary with closed-source. What’s wrong with just saying source-available (instead of open-source)? Calling this proprietary just leads to confusion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Because it gives the wrong impression that it is not proprietary, just like how you are making this exact mistake.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Because it’s not really about the “availability” of source code, but more about what you can actually do with the source code. If you don’t have the four freedoms it’s not free software.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Well free software isn’t the same thing as open-source software

permalink
report
parent
reply

Open Source

!opensource@lemmy.ml

Create post

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

  • Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
  • No NSFW content
  • No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

Community stats

  • 3.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.8K

    Posts

  • 30K

    Comments