You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
83 points

The topography explains it all. https://geology.com/articles/east-africa-rift.shtml

tl;dr The people of that area in East Africa naturally live close to sea level, however there are easily accessible elevations changes that distance runners have trained on for probably centuries. It turns out that training at high altitudes and recovering at low altitudes provides a tangible and demonstrable advantage compared to just single elevation training.

permalink
report
reply
47 points

This can’t be the whole story, otherwise we’d see places like Chile, Peru, and India competing too

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

India? the sea and the himalayas are too far apart to compare.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

India’s Deccan Plateau is about as elevated as most of Kenya’s highlands and takes up basically the entire land area of India that sticks out into the ocean

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The air sucks in India too

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No idea about the other two, but India’s sports administration is corrupt to the core. Funds are stolen by those on top, and athletes who complain - even about obviously criminal things like sexual assault - are pushed out. Some sports bodies (chess, for example) are better, but the big ones (cricket, wrestling, football) are mostly bad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Yeah like the other commenter said this isn’t it, nobody is commuting up and down 10,000’ on a regular basis, especially in antiquity. Just because different elevations “look close” on a map means nothing.

Far more likely is this is a concentrated population of folks with highly desirable traits for distance running.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points
*

The school of thought has generally changed.

Live high, train low is now the prevailing methodology.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
3 points

That’s good. I thought the map was being racist

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

The map is being racist by labelling Canada, Morocco and USA but not the super-relevant African countries. I’m baffled by that…

Like, I don’t think it’s intentional but how does that happen?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I didn’t really notice that. Oh shit, am I racist?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Maps aren’t racist. Map owners are racist. Map creators are just filling demand.

(replace “maps” with “dogs” and “racist” with “at fault for dog eugenics”)

permalink
report
parent
reply

Damn, that's interesting!

!damnthatsinteresting@lemmy.ml

Create post
  1. No clickbait
  2. No Racism and Hate speech
  3. No Imgur Gallery Links
  4. No Infographics
  5. Moderator Discretion
  6. Repost Guidelines
  7. No videos over 15 minutes long
  8. No “Photoshopped” posts
  9. Image w/ text posts must be sourced in comments

Community stats

  • 114

    Monthly active users

  • 130

    Posts

  • 881

    Comments

Community moderators