51

The Sun finds itself in line of fire over report on Huw Edwards(www.theguardian.com)

posted
by
Avatar
theinspectorst@kbin.social
in
Avatar
unitedkingdom@feddit.uk
24 comments
hidereport

Days after publication, the newsreader is in hospital with mental health issues and the paper is rapidly backtracking

Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
Avatar
MidgePhoto@photog.social
1 point

@Ace_of_spades @theinspectorst
You can stop watching the BBC
Also listening to it.
(As long as you don’t aspire to command an RN SSBN)

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
Ace_of_spades@lemmy.world
-2 points

I can stop watching it. I still need a TV license if I want to watch Dave, QVC or even Sky. Even if I stop watching the BBC.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
Flax@feddit.uk
1 point

Dave is owned by the BBC pretty sure

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
MidgePhoto@photog.social
1 point

@Ace_of_spades
In various Wireless Telegraphy Acts for the UK the licencing of reception and transmission, control of permitted bands, for both, and exceptionally reception or transmission of certain signals in certain bands has been regulated since shortly after it became feasible.

There are reasons.

However the BBC thing is a small part of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
Ace_of_spades@lemmy.world
1 point

.

That doesn’t disprove what I said. I don’t need a license fee in other countries, despite all these laws.

permalink
report
parent
reply

United Kingdom

!unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

Create post

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think “reputable news source” needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

Community stats

  • 1.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 2K

    Posts

  • 20K

    Comments

Community moderators