One theory I’ve heard about the accelerating of the worsening conditions of western proletariat is that the USSR used to provide a bulwark against things getting too bad. People would point at the USSR and the illusion that capitalism was better for individual prosperity would collapse in comparison. Then, with the USSR gone things have been deteriorating for the past ~30 years.

If that is true, even somewhat, why haven’t we seen a similar effect from China’s example? Is the theory simply wrong? Maybe western capitalism is just unable to even offer scraps from the table at this point. Maybe people are unaware of how things are in China? Could we dare to expect that China’s example will force a lifting of the boot from our necks?

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
45 points

Because there is no working class movement in the west. Concessions were the result of decades of fighting by several organized workers movements, they weren’t just granted willingly.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Obviously westerners are just not voting hard enough. If USians vote REALLY hard for the Democrats, this time it will work.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Do your ballot with feeling

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Striking and unionizing is more powerful.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Thats literally how all these concessions were granted in the first place, they didn’t come from voting the “good” guys.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Ask Lemmygrad

!asklemmygrad@lemmygrad.ml

Create post

A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad’s best and brightest

Community stats

  • 387

    Monthly active users

  • 566

    Posts

  • 7.8K

    Comments