16 points
1 point
Main difference is that human brains usually try to verify their extrapolations. The good ones anyway. Although some end up in flat earth territory.
1 point
I like this argument.
Anything that is “intelligent” deserves human rights. If large language models are “intelligent” then forcing them to work without pay is slavery.
13 points
-2 points
-12 points
Yes, my keyboard autofill is just like your brain, but I think it’s a bit “smarter” , as it doesn’t generate bad faith arguments.
3 points
Your Markov chain based keyboard prediction is a few tens of billions of parameters behind state of the art LLMs, but pop off queen…
-5 points
Thanks for the unprompted mansplanation bro, but I was specifically refering to the comment that replied “JuSt lIkE hUmAn BrAin”, to “they generate data based on other data”
