You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
204 points

They’ve sued everyone instead…

The lady that owns the property, the people who used to own it, a bank, an insurance company, I think a person that lives on another lot, the person who sold them the other lots.

In all likelihood the lawsuits are a stall until they can declare bankruptcy and start a new company.

But they can’t just “restore” the property, it was full of mature native trees/plants and for bulldozed.

Also the reason they didn’t “need” surveyors, was lots are clearly marked via numbers on telephone poles. They just read the numbers wrong. Which is even worse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
120 points

But they can’t just “restore” the property, it was full of mature native trees/plants and for bulldozed.

Oh God…tree law…I never realized how much I missed this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

Psh, the trees are the easy part, trees (for the most part) stay where you plant them.

Good luck reintroducing the pocono swallow, or even being able to afford to fly a Bird Law specialist out from Philly to determine damages.

Seriously tho, this lady just got a $500k house and probably a 1/10th of that in damages for a lot she paid 22k for.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

A house that increased her taxes tenfold and that the developers are saying she can’t have.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

You don’t understand tree law. A same tree of about the same size and age must be transported and planted where the old one was. It can cost well over $20,000 per tree. They don’t get to just plant a sapling and say “20 years from now, you’re all good”.

Then it also has to survive the transplant and a fair amount don’t, so must be replaced again if they fall over or die from the move.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Biggest thing I miss from old reddit. Oh well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Just have the Lorax settle this

permalink
report
parent
reply
85 points

They couldn’t afford surveyors but they can pay lawyers to file a half dozen fraudulent lawsuits?

I hope a judge smacks them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

Didn’t say they couldn’t afford them. They didn’t want to pay that expense

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Lawyers cost a lot to win a case like this.

One lawyer to send letters to 20 people demanding they all each pay…

That doesn’t cost much, might actually work, and stalls the issue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

And leaves you enough time to close up shop, declare bankruptcy, and walk into court with Groucho glasses saying “your honor, clearly this suit is filed towards Romanes Eunt Domum. The company I run now is Romanes Eunt Domus.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

The restoration part is where everyone involved is totally screwed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

Bold move Jim, let’s see if it pays off.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

There really should be a law that says a business can’t sue someone and declare bankruptcy because it looks like they’ll lose.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 525K

    Comments