You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
57 points

I can’t be the only one, so WSL = Windows subsystem for Linux.

permalink
report
reply
65 points

which, confusingly enough, is a linux subsystem under windows. The name sounds like the opposite.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Really just an English problem. Read it as it is a subsystem by Windows for Linux.

But yeah, LSW would’ve been more clear. Plus, it’s almost LSD.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Linux Subsystem for DOS

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I think it makes more sense to read that it’s a “Windows Subsystem for (running) Linux (applications/programs)”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Maybe it’s some marketing thing? Like their feature MUST start with Windows™ regardless of getting confusing as hell, it may also help not techie people who make decisions and want to still use a Windows™ solution suggested by a techie

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It should be Windows’s Subsystem for Linux.

A better acronym might be Windows’ Linux Subsystem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

WSL 1 is a compatibility layer that lets Linux programs run on the Windows kernel by translating Linux system calls to Windows system calls, so in that sense I understand the name: it’s a Windows subsystem for Linux [compatibility]. It doesn’t use the Linux kernel at all. With WSL 2 they’re using a real Linux kernel in a virtual machine, so there the name doesn’t make much sense anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Isn’t it just Hyper-V with extra steps?

permalink
report
parent
reply

linuxmemes

!linuxmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:
Community rules
  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

Community stats

  • 7.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.2K

    Posts

  • 68K

    Comments