58

"Clean" Code, Horrible Performance in Rust(chrs.dev)

posted
by
Avatar
chrs@programming.dev
in
Avatar
rust@programming.dev
25 comments
hidereport
Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
Avatar
arendjr@programming.dev
9 points

I think they meant using for accumulating, like this:

shapes.iter().map(Shape::area).sum()
permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
Turun@feddit.de
4 points

Yes. That’s what I meant.

Though I heavily expect the rust compiler to produce identical assembly for both types of iteration.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
onlinepersona@programming.dev
2 points

Oh, I see. That would be interesting to benchmark too 👍

Anti Commercial AI thingy

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
2 points

Anti Commercial AI thingy

Off-topic, but does that actually work? I would assume OpenAI would just ignore it and you’d have to prove that they did so.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
onlinepersona@programming.dev
5 points

Dunno if it works. AI has been tricked into revealing it’s training data, so it’s possible that it happens and they are sued for using copyrighted material.

This is my drop in the ocean.

Anti Commercial AI thingy

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

permalink
report
parent
reply
Show more comments

Rust

!rust@programming.dev

Create post

Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.

Wormhole

!performance@programming.dev

Credits
  • The icon is a modified version of the official rust logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)

Community stats

  • 753

    Monthly active users

  • 866

    Posts

  • 3.5K

    Comments

Community moderators