You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
-15 points

What’s wrong with colored people?

How is this different from saying people of color lol

permalink
report
reply
45 points

Colored people is defining them as the color first, person second. Combined with historical connotations it’s a phrase that when used is almost always in a racist way.

People of Color is a term that has been reappropriated and is more humanizing. It’s also not associated with racists like the other phrase.

It’s a small difference, and to a lot of people they don’t see a difference, but it is there and takes very little to no effort to use the preferred terminology.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

And yet those semantics are trivial to change and have real effects on people. It costs you nothing to call people what they’d like to be called.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

And those semantics are very important to people and ridiculously easy to do right, so why do it wrong on purpose unless you are deliberately an asshole?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Semantics matter!!!

Semantics are about the meaning of words, and how the meaning can be changed drastically by minor changes of a sentence or the sequence of words that have similar meaning? Semantics are important, even if the above poster believe they aren’t.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantics

Formal semantics seeks to identify domain-specific mental operations which speakers perform when they compute a sentence’s meaning

That’s exactly the case here? The words have similar meaning, but the sentences do not, both because of the cultural origin, and the sequence of the words actually matter.

Edit: I was originally a bit confused, because the above post uses the word semantics contrary to the meaning. I guess that can be expected for people who just in general don’t get it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

You could try reading a comment before replying to it next time. Assuming you replied to the right comment, which might not be the case.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-22 points

In the Netherlands we would say you are fucking ants

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Why are you commenting on an article about American politics in the first place? Surely this has literally nothing to do with your life.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I’m no expert, but I suspect that it’s because “colored people” was a term used by racist groups in the past, especially during segregation in America. Just look for old pictures of signs from that era and you’ll see stuff like “Colored Water Fountain”

As for why “people of color” is acceptable, idk. I guess it’s a broader term that applies to more than just black people, but worded differently to show it’s not a segregation era term.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

“Colored” is a term used during segregation explicitly as a racist term, for example, “colored-only” bathrooms and drinking fountains. At best, it’s considered an antiqued term but some still see it as having the same racist meaning.

“People of color” while sounding similar doesn’t carry that same history.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Can someone please explain? I’ve been told I’m supposed to refer to black people as people of color, or people with dark skin.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

One outs the color first and has been used by racists for centuries. The other comes from the community and puts the fact that they are a person first.

Without the history of slavery and continued oppression it wouldn’t matter, which is why ‘white people’ is not derogatory on its own.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Thank you for this very concise yet perfectly descriptive explanation, I was a bit confused as a non American about the difference.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 473K

    Comments