Movie industry demands US law requiring ISPs to block piracy websites(arstechnica.com)

posted 7 months ago

PirateJesus@lemmy.today

piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

35 commentshide report

Sort:

Hot Top Controversial New Old

You are viewing a single thread.

View all comments

[ - ]

amigan@lemmy.dynatron.me

10 points

7 months ago

Hopefully this doesn’t affect quad9 or cloud flare DNS, or I might have to go back to running a root resolver. The horrors.

permalink

report

[ - ]

Achsonaja@sh.itjust.works

5 points

7 months ago

Why not run unbound for a recursive resolver? Seems like a more private DNS solution

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

amigan@lemmy.dynatron.me

3 points

7 months ago

I have straight bind running on my network already for local zones, it would be easy enough to switch it to be a root resolver. The only problem is it’s a lot slower. I use DoT to cloudflare for non-local zones (using blocky); if you run a root resolver, your DNS traffic is all in the clear. Not like it truly matters but I wouldn’t put it past my ISP to do DPI on DNS traffic to try to sell my data.

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

safesyrup@lemmy.hogru.ch

4 points

7 months ago

Do you know if cloudflare is privacy respecting? I know quad9 certainly is

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

amigan@lemmy.dynatron.me

2 points

7 months ago

I trust them more than my ISP (Verizon). Quad9 is, and I used it for some time as an upstream, but it is markedly slower for me than cloudflare. Those milliseconds add up for an impatient asshole like myself.

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]