I think it was the prime minister (or spokesperson) who made this very clever argument: (paraphrasing) “we are not taking away choice… cigarettes are designed to inherently take away your choice by trapping you in an addiction.”

I’m not picking sides here, just pointing out a great piece of rhetoric to spin the policy as taking away something that takes away your choice. Effectively putting forward the idea that you don’t have choice to begin with.

(sorry to say this rhetoric was not mentioned in the linked article; I just heard it on BBC World Service)

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
11 points

Didn’t New Zealand try this and eventually walk it back?

permalink
report
reply
13 points

A different government came in and cancelled it to fund tax cuts

permalink
report
parent
reply

Community stats

  • 4

    Monthly active users

  • 18

    Posts

  • 163

    Comments

Community moderators