Democrats who investigated Trump say they expect to face arrest, retaliation if he wins presidency(www.cbsnews.com)

posted 5 months ago

Rapidcreek@lemmy.world

politics@lemmy.world

198 commentshide report

Sort:

Hot Top Controversial New Old

You are viewing a single thread.

View all comments

[ - ]

Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee

17 points

5 months ago

I mean, he said he would. He’s also become a better asshole since the last attempt, and now he said on day one he’s gonna fire everyone who’s loyal to the united states and replace them with people who are loyal to him personally. That’s how you put yourself in a position where the military actually listens to you when you tell them to “crack the skulls” of, “beat the fuck out of” and “just shoot” peaceful protestors.

permalink

report

[ - ]

RaoulDook@lemmy.world

6 points

5 months ago

The military is not going to do any of that. The US Joint Chiefs have made it clear on multiple occasions that they take their oath of office to uphold the US Constitution very seriously, including at least 2 times in direct opposition to Trump’s bullshit.

They basically are the unofficial 4th branch of the US government, and their checks and balances are effective against fascists.

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee

1 point

5 months ago

Genuinely asking because I can’t seem to find it online - who decides who the joint chiefs are?

permalink

report

parent

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News