You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
24 points
*

As if you wouldn’t steal a £30 pound steak if it had zero consequences and no morals attached, besides that I don’t think anything deserves to be abused before getting killed and especially not in public with children watching.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

So you’re saying he should had been more effective in killing the seagull in front of the kids

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

He just shouldn’t have done it, but obviously yes that too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Obviously a waste of good avian meat

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

if it had zero consequences

And yet, here there were consequences.

It’s just a specific breeding programme and he was culling the failures. #evolution \s

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Exactly, he’s helping nature

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I don’t see where it says he abused the bird before killing it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

exactly, the swing probably was to get enough speed

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Pretty sure it dying instantly in a quick whack is the opposite of being abused

Like no he shouldn’t have done that but you’re going a little overboard

permalink
report
parent
reply

okmatewanker

!okmatewanker@feddit.uk

Create post

No foul language - i.e. French 🤮

Obviously satire, dozy wankers

Community stats

  • 1.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 208

    Posts

  • 2.4K

    Comments