You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
4 points

I would like to know why they prefer FreeBSD to Linux.

permalink
report
reply
10 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Uhm. AFAIK, you only have to share code under the GPL if you distribute binaries outside your organisation.

If it stays in-house, there’s no distribution, thus no requirement to share the source.

I’m happy to be wrong, feel free to point out what I missed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

White what you say is true, I feel like this has more to do with their engineers being better at or more comfortable with FreeBSD or something like that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’d say we don’t know unless we ask Netflix engineers but the comments about license look like a good one to me. Then there is in my opinion the “bloated” Linux versus the more clean BSD experience (I am a Linux user and I like to tinker with BSD sometimes). Maybe it is still true that BSD will not run on as much hardware as Linux does but have you ever compiled a custom kernel on BSD and compared it to compiling a custom kernel on Linux ? On BSD it is in comparison much easier and the documentation is usually really good.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

No, the GPLv2 does not require you to publish your modifications.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

One reason is the network stack

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Can you explain more?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Open Source

!opensource@lemmy.ml

Create post

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

  • Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
  • No NSFW content
  • No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

Community stats

  • 3.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.8K

    Posts

  • 30K

    Comments