Google is laying off more employees and hiring for their roles outside of the U.S.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
104 points

So they ditch the people who helped make them successful? What kind of ass-backwards strategy is this?

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

It’s called

Late Stage Capitalism

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I already made this comment on a completely different post, but it’s funny to see it’s fruition. McDonald’s executives bitching that fast food price increases have priced a lot of their low income customers off their menu… like they had no hand in it

permalink
report
parent
reply
109 points
*

“Juice the next 3 months.”

Thats it. Thats the whole strategy each exec uses until they leave.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

How can I get one of these jobs? Important detail I’m not rich.

Seems like a low skill job.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Quick answer this one question.

You are given a button that upon pressing kills 100,000 people. The button does nothing else.

Do you press the button?

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

There’s a recent podcast talking about this if you’re interested - https://omny.fm/shows/better-offline/the-man-that-destroyed-google-search

TLDR; they fired the guy largely responsible for building google search and replaced him with the guy running google ads.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Yup, and that’s why monopolies are bad. Once you get a dominant position, the way to increase profits is by abusing your market position. And publicly traded companies need to increase profits because that’s what shareholders expect.

In this case, reducing the quality of search means people need to search more often, which means they see more ads. As a double-whammy, if you improve the relevance of the ad results while reducing the relevance of the regular results, you get more click-through on the ads. So Google has little incentive, while it has a dominant position, of having a good search product. They’ll only care again if that dominance gets threatened.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yes. They have let go people that worked there for over 15 years.

I believe what Mark Zuckerberg said about the tech layoffs, streamlining by getting rid of more management roles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I could imagine them letting AI (or offshore workers) manage everything, and keeping the managers around with chatbots reporting in to the managers, so they wouldn’t know they were being replaced.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 553K

    Comments