In line with her comments regarding her personal bias prior to hearing arguments, she determined that magazines aren’t covered by the 2A and even if they were, banning them fits within history and tradition, because… um… yeah, it gets a bit muddy after that. Still waiting on Benitez to issue the opinion in his case.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
4 points

California has had a large capacity magazine ban for as long as I can remember. Why are you saying we know this ends with it getting overturned when we’re seeing more and more states passing these laws and they’re all sticking?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Because LCM bans can not be justified under the text history and tradition standard for evaluating restrictions on the 2A set by the US Supreme Court. Bruen has more implications beyond just carry.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

That’s great as law theory, but in reality they’re sticking.

permalink
report
parent
reply

guns

!guns@lemmy.world

Create post

Keep it civil.

Community stats

  • 179

    Monthly active users

  • 221

    Posts

  • 678

    Comments