You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
5 points

You’ve got to understand the audience he’s talking to and the effect he’s trying to have. It’s not a legal claim being made in a legal setting and he knows it. Instead, he’s talking to people who are motivated by outrage. It’s incredibly disingenuous and I think you stop behavior like this just by talking away the benefit he has by acting this way. So let him be irrelevant and drown him out! If no one hears they aren’t going to get outraged.

permalink
report
parent
reply

New York Times gift articles

!nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz

Create post

Share your New York Times gift articles links here.

Rules:

Info:

Tip:

Community stats

  • 1.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.4K

    Posts

  • 4.1K

    Comments

Community moderators