Aspiring Author K. Renee was reportedly locked out of her own content on Google Docs after Google flagged it as “inappropriate.”

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
31 points
*

Original Wired article says later in it that Google thought she was spamming. This is relayed through the author though and not Google directly.

And you’re right. She still had all her work, just couldn’t share it.

Also, I haven’t read the author’s content, but nothing I saw when I searched the name seems to indicate it was CP. Also, the fact that Google didn’t remove the content entirely indicates it wasn’t illegal content.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

"Google never specified which of her 222,000 words was inappropriate. There were no highlighted sections, no indicators of what had rendered her documents unshareable. Had one of her readers flagged the content without discussing it with her first? "

So much of her work could have broken the T&Cs that she can’t identify what it could be without highlights.

Original Wired article says later in it that Google thought she was spamming

Different author, but if that’s the case (and it seems this author shares files to over 80 people in one go) then it’s a spam filter issue? Again, non story.

The headline is a complete lie.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Ah. I can’t pull the original article back up due to a pay wall but I did read it quickly so is possible it was a different author.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You can bypass paywalls by archiving the article. Try archive.is

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.zip

Create post

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English only

Title and associated content has to be in English.

2. Use original link

Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.

3. Respectful communication

All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.

4. Inclusivity

Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.

5. Ad hominem attacks

Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can’t argue your position without attacking a person’s character, you already lost the argument.

6. Off-topic tangents

Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.

7. Instance rules may apply

If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

Community stats

  • 3K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.2K

    Posts

  • 8.3K

    Comments

Community moderators