You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
3 points

No paper, no party.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

indeed:

The new claims from the “CCHP” group, asserting that the Hubble tension can be resolved by an in-between value for the expansion rate, are very troublesome for two reasons. First, there isn’t even a paper (not even an unpublished preprint) to refer to, where others in the community can see their work. But secondly and perhaps even more importantly, (…)

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Using a quote with a cliffhanger is the newest form of evil.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

lol 😋 …
Secondly (and now I say that from memory) that other group had a larger margin of error so their measurement should not be taken to disprove the Hubble tension.

permalink
report
parent
reply

BecomeMe

!becomeme@sh.itjust.works

Create post

Social Experiment. Become Me. What I see, you see.

Community stats

  • 2

    Monthly active users

  • 2.8K

    Posts

  • 3.8K

    Comments

Community moderators