You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
53 points

They said after the first leak that it wasn’t an issue since they calculated that it would take 4 leaks of that size to disable the thruster system. Now they have 3.

permalink
report
reply
20 points

I hope we didn’t assume the odds of each leak was an independent event. Same failure mode and maybe we have uncovered something systemic! Kind of scary

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Since the cause of the first leak was a defective rubber seal, it would have made sense to replace all of them. I’m pretty sure they didn’t use different types of seals on each thruster port. But for that, they would have had to disassemble the spacecraft and that would have taken too long for the available launch windows.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

It’s a good thing rubber seals have never caused any problems in spaceflight

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

And the titanic was unsinkable

permalink
report
parent
reply

Space

!space@lemmy.world

Create post

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators’ instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

🔭 Science
🚀 Engineering
🌌 Art and Photography

Other Cool Links

Community stats

  • 1.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 848

    Posts

  • 6.3K

    Comments