You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
3 points

If this was meant to be a good PR thing for Reddit, they wouldn’t have done that terrible AMA. I really do thing Reddit is dead set on their plans right now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Spez and his ego are too invested in it now. He can’t back down, his ego won’t allow him to. Although, I could see a vote of no confidence from the board removing him and them saying “Oops our bad, we’ve removed him and we’re going to listen to the community.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Reddit is using spez to cop the hate and take the fall. He will resign from his position and take a ‘behind the scenes’ type job at reddit. Then a new public face will be appointed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I almost wonder if the whole thing was a deliberate move to make some of us leave. They view us as negative value users.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Demanding that a for-profit business forego profit seeking is like asking a cat to stop hunting.

It’s what they do.

Communities are fundamentally not profitable. Maintaining community requires work and infrastructure, and all adding profit on top of that does is increase the price of maintenance.

The profit motivation, instead, causes people to do things that are inherently anti-social, and which injure communities.

Reddit is entertainment, above all else. There’s no “community” in a forum with 2 million people in it. There is only noise. But communities found homes on Reddit, and Reddit has no use for them.

There’s no profit motivation here, though. Costs need to be covered, but costs are also distributed. Transparency and the understanding that community is an investment can keep things rolling and free of meddling from pepole who want to abuse our psychology and degrade our mental heakth to line their pockets.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Reddit and their sham AMA will be remembered as how NOT to manage a social platform and its PR

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Do we really need more examples of how to not manage a social platform and it’s PR?
can we get some positive examples instead

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

tom from myspace

end of list.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Never forget what happened to digg.com People don’t seem to learn, although they managed to slowly bring the site to a halt in 14 years which a long time so they are not that stupid I guess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I don’t think it’s a problem of not learning the lesson. The problem is that you can’t succeed in making a social network if you ask anyone to pay in any way. You need it to be useful, which means you need everyone on it, and everyone won’t be on it if it costs anything or is otherwise gated behind even the smallest of hurdles. So rich VCs come in and say, “here’s $100,000,000 to go make this thing invaluable, and then I want my money back with a handsome profit”. Everyone in the game always knows that the product is going to get shitty when it comes time to pay the piper. Being shitty is a side-effect of making money. The gamble is that it’ll be so ingrained in people’s life than they’ll begrudging eat the shit to keep using it. They’re looking for the elbow in the curve – how shitty can it be before everyone abandons it. That spot of maximum shittiness isn’t a mistake – it’s the target.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Reddit Migration

!RedditMigration@kbin.social

Create post

### About Community Tracking and helping #redditmigration to Kbin and the Fediverse. Say hello to the decentralized and open future. To see latest reeddit blackout info, see here: https://reddark.untone.uk/

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 972

    Posts

  • 20K

    Comments

Community moderators