You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
21 points

Well, hopefully this will at least force stability’s hand in some way and get them to at least make an official statement instead of just remaining silent.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

TBH they don’t want anything to do with CivitAI, so maybe this is their way of sabotaging SD3 for it?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Jokes on them. SD3 is garbage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It has a lot of potential if the T5 can be made conversational. After diving into a custom DPM adaptive sampler, there is a lot more specificity required. I believe the vast majority of people are not using the model with the correct workflow. Applying the old model workflows to SD3 makes garbage results. The 2 CLIPS models and the T5 need separate prompts, and the negative prompt needs an inverted channel with a slight delay before reintegration. I also think the smaller quantized version of the T5 is likely the primary problem overall. Any Transformer text model that small, that is them quantized to extremely small size is problematic.

The license is garbage. The company is toxic. But the tool is more complex than most of the community seems to understand. I can generate a woman lying on grass in many intentional and iterative ways.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Stable Diffusion

!stable_diffusion@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Create post

Discuss matters related to our favourite AI Art generation technology

Also see

Other communities

Community stats

  • 182

    Monthly active users

  • 719

    Posts

  • 1.5K

    Comments

Community moderators