Source of data: https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/T0HSJ1

Edit: removed OC as it’s not (sorry)

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
8 points

I might miss the point, but the height is dependent on both parents genetically, so just comparing mothers with daughters is a bit like the usual “correlation does not equal causation” thingie, or not?

permalink
report
reply
16 points

The X and Y are just labeled weird, both graphs reference father’s height has the X and mother’s height as the Y

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yeah, but there is no graph comparing son vs mother and daughter vs father.

And it seems like an odd thing to omit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

If I’m reading the referenced link right, the data is from 1886(?), so it’s not terribly recent, either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Oh, completely missed that, thanks!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

That’s exactly what this is showing. The x axis is the fathers height and the y-axis the mothers height so you see daughters change of being taller going up when their dads are bigger. For sons the chance of being bigger than their father goes up with tall mothers.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Data is Beautiful

!dataisbeautiful@mander.xyz

Create post

Be respectful

Community stats

  • 1.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 125

    Posts

  • 1.9K

    Comments