Source of data: https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/T0HSJ1
Edit: removed OC as it’s not (sorry)
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments 8 points
I might miss the point, but the height is dependent on both parents genetically, so just comparing mothers with daughters is a bit like the usual “correlation does not equal causation” thingie, or not?
16 points
The X and Y are just labeled weird, both graphs reference father’s height has the X and mother’s height as the Y
5 points
Yeah, but there is no graph comparing son vs mother and daughter vs father.
And it seems like an odd thing to omit.
9 points
If I’m reading the referenced link right, the data is from 1886(?), so it’s not terribly recent, either.
1 point
1 point
*