You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
210 points
*

Gnome devs : we broke the toilet extension. Your pokemons have nowhere to shit and piss.

Pokemon trainers : why the fuck is the toilet an extension. Shouldn’t it be part of the DE?

Gnome devs : we believe the toilet feature is unnecessary, so it wasn’t and will never be implemented.

Note : I’ve barely used gnome in my life so it’s based on memes I’ve seen about gnome.

permalink
report
reply
140 points

The only thing you got wrong is that the toilet extension would be a third-party thing, and Gnome devs would actively insult anyone who dared be upset they broke it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points
*

I was gonna say that it was a third party extension, but then I thought that gnomes users would infer that pretty easily.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points
*

Long time Gnome user here: I like the general Gnome simplicity of use and workflow and got used to it, but I’m really tired of having to install extensions for very basic things, and of it messing all my extensions on each version upgrade, so I have to reinstall everything. I started experimenting with KDE, and looking forward to cosmic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Yeah, KDE’s basically at the point you don’t need GNOME imo, it’s so customizable you can make it basically look/function the same as GNOME without having to put up with GNOME’s dumber decisions

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I tend to flip flop, I like some things in GNOME better, but the lack of customization always brings me back to KDE after a while (Plasma, whatever)

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

For me it’s KDE on desktop, GNOME on laptop.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

It’s close to alpha! I don’t think it’ll be in a good enough state for me (Nvidia GPU), but maybe someday.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’ve been daily driving the pre-alpha since January, it’s definitely got a bit of jank, but it’s in really good shape. The alpha should be pretty usable, and I think by the beta it should be pretty much good to go.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

When I first started on Linux with Fedora probably a little over 15 years ago, I used gnome just because it was different. At some point I played with Enlightenment, and now I use KDE. It was different when I was more interested in screwing around with my system. Now that I use it for work, I just need everything to be as reliable, persistent, and easy as possible. I haven’t used gnome in many years, but I hear these stories all the time and I just don’t want to deal with something that’ll wrench my workflow when I have other shit to do and no time to play diagnostics.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Yeah, Cosmic looks really nice. Their app store interface needs a bit of modernization work, but otherwise, it looks well polished.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Do you know how vim has distributions like lunarvim, lazvim, nvchad, etc.? Simply installing something like lazyvim can quickly and easily convert vim from a text editor to a full blown IDE.

I think Gnome needs something like this. A curated set of plugins that are easy to install and maintain compatibility with different versions of Gnome - something that would deal with the API churn in Gnome while maintaining a stable, usable desktop environment.

I don’t know if this is feasible, because I haven’t used Gnome since 2.x, but I think it would really help make it an actual full blown DE.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

The problem is the Gnome team doesn’t give a flying rat’s ass about maintaining a stable api. I’ve never bothered with extensions because even the most basic stuff only works for one or two versions. The neovim team is pretty committed to backwards compatibility and following standards for interoperability like LSP these days, so it’s much easier for third parties to maintain a large set of extended functionality at this point. If they acted like the gnome team, your status bar plugin would break every other update.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I only tried GNOME long enough to see how crap it is, and have been a happy KDE user for years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Can I ask what extensions you are using in gnome?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I use several, but the ones that I consider to be basic functions are caffeine, tray icons, places status indicator, removable drive menu and extended volume indicator. That last one is a nice example of my frustration, because it can’t be installed on the current gnome version anymore, and having to open settings to switch my audio output is terrible. Every distro upgrade have been the same experience, and I lose some functionality

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I went the other way. I liked the simplicity, and thought what about MORE simplicity? I went to i3 and haven’t really looked back yet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

It’s more like, there is one way to go to the toilet but it involves going into a small porcelain cup. They refuse to admit that’s not practical, or that it doesn’t work for everybody, or allow people to use anything else. You will use the little porcelain cup no matter how absurd it is and that’s it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

Wrong. If an extension for your need isn’t enough, you can very simply just use another DE. No one is entitled to random free custom development work

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

No one is entitled to random free custom development work.

Meaning gnome devs themselves are not entitled to the free custom development work of the third party extension devs, and therefore gnome is actively taking advantage of the third party developers(Third-party developers feel undervalued & exploited, potentially leading to burnout and abandonment of projects) while all round making it harder for them to maintain the extensions(GNOME’s decision not to provide a stable API for extensions makes it challenging for third-party developers to maintain their work across GNOME versions).
This is where KDE Community is different, they actively support, communicate, collaborate, etc. with 3rd party devs to build a strong relationship & a strong ecosystem.
In fact, Gnome devs are all around abrasive to the entire Linux ecosystem, including but not limited to the Wayland development team & the development teams of other desktop environments(GNOME’s design decisions, such as only supporting CSD & lobbying Wayland to mandate CSD & the controversy over the accent color protocol, have led to conflicts with the entire Linux ecosystem), their own user base(GNOME’s communication style is dismissive & unresponsive to community feedback), application developers(GNOME’s decisions sometimes force other projects to adapt or create workarounds, as seen with the server-side decoration controversy, further complicating development efforts), third party developers, and even amongst themselves(There are reports of conflicts even within the GNOME development team, suggesting internal tensions).

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Note : I’ve barely used gnome in my life so it’s based on memes I’ve saw about gnome

and it shows

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

2 other responses I got confirmed that such thing happens and you say otherwise. Doesn’t Gnome breaks third party extensions that provides users basic functionality that should be in gnome in the first place but the devs don’t want to implement? Is the meme wrong?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Not that guy but phrases like “basic functionality” are just hard to pin down. What you need for your workflow and can’t live without is probably irrelevant fluff to a whole other class of folks.

I haven’t run into anything I need a third-party extension for yet, so I guess it works for some of us, although admittedly I do very few things on that machine so I could easily be missing something vital for most people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

Is the meme wrong?

Yes, it is.

basic functionality that should be in gnome in the first place

Who gets to decide what’s “basic” functionality? Each desktop’s team has their vision for what they want to implement. Something that might be basic to one person might not be in someone else’s vision or…

the devs don’t want to implement

…is being worked on but needs design. GNOME is design-oriented. It doesn’t matter how much you scream that something needs implementing if no one designs how that implementation will work and why it should be implemented in the first place. It’s not about “not wanting”, it’s about making sure that when something is implemented, that it’ll work well both now and in the future.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

it’s based on memes

So you’re basing an opinion on the world’s dumbest, least accurate form of communication

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I mean, dude got it pretty spot on, so can we really criticize the accuracy?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

He did not get anything spot on

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

As I said, I briefly used gnome in the far past and just remember being weirded out by the design choices that felt very “Apple like” . So them pulling an “Apple” and doing the “we know better than the user” doesn’t feel out of place.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

This comment implies that Microsoft design choices are better which is hilarious

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

So you’re basing an opinion on the world’s basedest, most accurate form of communication

FTFY

permalink
report
parent
reply

linuxmemes

!linuxmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:
Community rules
  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

Community stats

  • 7.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.3K

    Posts

  • 70K

    Comments