You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
-44 points

clearly they have never heard of harry g frankfurts (excellent) „on bullshit“

permalink
report
reply
92 points
*

The paper explicitly states that they are calling ChatGPT “bullshit” in the Frankfurtian sense and they cite “On Bullshit” as the source for that definition. It’s right there in the introduction.

You’d know this if you had read the paper or even checked whether your statement were true. So either you read it and then lied deliberately, or you didn’t read the paper nor actually care about the truth value of your own statement, rendering your comment itself bullshit in the Frankfurtian sense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

By grabthar’s hammer, what a put down!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Best movie ever.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Sheesh, leave some for the rest of us to pick on, you savage!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-24 points

jesus christ ofc i didn‘t read the paper, i was just making a joke ffs

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

It was a bad joke

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Actually, they reference him.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Science Memes

!science_memes@mander.xyz

Create post

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.4K

    Posts

  • 83K

    Comments