85

The Economist is indistinguishable from The Onion nowadays(lemmygrad.ml)

posted
by
Avatar
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.ml
in
Avatar
shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml
16 comments
hidereport
Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
Avatar
stasis@lemmygrad.ml
6 points

is the economist trying to portray china as bourgeois? if not then why is it saying this

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
USSR Enjoyer@lemmygrad.ml
9 points

I think so, but in the way dumbfuck libs co-opt marxist language with zero understanding. Being able to structure a sentence to merely sound like a hypocrisy or contradiction is more than enough to fool most westerners.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
5 points
*

They mean the Chinese workers are “non-working class” because they can retire before death or becoming completely sucked up human wreck. Just the usual nearly two centuries old Economist stance on workers.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Shit Reactionaries Say

!shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Create post

Under new rules (Jan 2023), only this “Shit X Say” community is allowed along with Shit Ultras Say.

This community is for anything a reactionary would say that is shit. You know the drill. This includes:

  • Liberals
  • Fascists
  • Conservatives
  • Monarchists
  • Vaushites

etc etc.

Please do include the type of reactionary between brackets [] in your post title if you can.

All posts are marked NSFW (community is NSFW) because most people don’t want to see this on their lemmygrad timeline.

Community stats

  • 685

    Monthly active users

  • 2.5K

    Posts

  • 20K

    Comments

Community moderators