Archived copy of the article: archive.today

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-1 points

That’s the issue though, trees were thought to be carbon positive, A the tree species matters, and when the trees naturally die it comes back out. It’s only temporary storage.

Idk if I would call it a scam or if they just didn’t do enough prior research ahead of time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You’re being way too thoughtful and nice about it. Commendable, truly - but the people running this scam might just as well buy a box of matches and promise not to ignite them. It’s to evade regulation, not to actually make a change.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

In the context of the USA, yeah I guess that’s fair.

Other countries have better checks and balances, most of what I’ve seen on this has been non-USA research, so likely there’s a reason for that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I don’t think it all comes out though? Unless you just burn the wood or allow it to decay.

I reckon that a timber house is going to be carbon positive for quite a while. Unless it burns down or is neglected so bad that it decays. Same for high quality furniture.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

You’re not wrong, but eventually it will decay and come out. 1000 years, or demolished for an expansion after 10 years.

Survivorship bias as well, not all timber houses will last the test of time, same with furniture. The point is, it all will eventually come back out, so it’s more of a, not my problem, it’s the futures problem. Or ship it to someone else. Either way, it’s neutral.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

In the span of 1000 years, is there anything we can do anyway?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

!climate@slrpnk.net

Create post

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Community stats

  • 5.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.1K

    Posts

  • 25K

    Comments

Community moderators