You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
10 points
*

I think a better analogy would be that someone wrote an article about how cigarettes cause cancer but a random commentator complains that they don’t talk about radon.

Does radon cause lung cancer? Yes. Is that what the article is talking about? No.

Was I being an inflammatory asshole in my first comment? Yeah, sorry. I’m argumentative today. I try to not be but sometimes I can’t help it; I’m working on it though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Don’t be sorry. Most of their posts are a bOtH siDeS bit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Not expecting a real answer, but wanted to try:

In America there’s two parties, but three groups of voters.

Parties:

  1. Democratic

  2. Republican.

Groups:

  1. Conservative
  2. Moderate
  3. Progressive

For the groups, 1 and 2 always shit on 3.

2 and 3 shit on 1.

But if anyone from 3 says anything that isn’t unadulterated praise of 2…

2 complains about “bOtH sIdES”.

And when 1 shits on 2, 2 apologizes and acts more like 1

Why?

Why are moderates not allowed to be criticized from the left? But when the right does it, they compromise with conservatives?

Do you honestly think group three is only allowed to criticize group one? If so why?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Like, read the article again (for the first time) and tell me what the article says is the cause.

They don’t.

They just talk about how bad cancer is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Is radon considered the only viable alternative to smoking?

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 331K

    Comments