I am not allowed to credit the site that has this disaster. Its owner said “Nobody should see that”

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
1 point

Huh, neat. The last time I looked, chrome was also plagued by this. Might actually re-start some projects I had, but it sucks to have to use chrome.

inline-flex is indeed necessary since we’re growing left to right and flex would take the entire/fixed width, unless it’s also inside a flexbox.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

it sucks to have to use chrome

I also hate to admit it, but Chrome currently is the superior browser.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Chromium is a superior engine, yes. But Chrome itself, at least in my eyes, looks to be the least capable browser out of the bunch. I’d rather Vivaldi if I had to switch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Inline is never needed and you already know that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

EDIT: Alright, this is a terrible case because the parent element has flex and therefore no inline-flex is necessary there, but I’d argue it’s the parent element being flex that is redundant, rather than child element being inline.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Inline means that your element should be treated like text. If your element is not text, then you shouldn’t use inline. In this screenshot the element is text, so it’s ok.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Programmer Humor

!programmer_humor@programming.dev

Create post

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

  • Keep content in english
  • No advertisements
  • Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics

Community stats

  • 9.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 861

    Posts

  • 33K

    Comments