You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-3 points

You’re arguing against a point I’m not making.

I play Go, and have since I learnt about the game when it was discussed in my Computer Science degree course (then computers were considered 50+ years away from beating humans).

Overall, AlphaGo has been a good thing for human players, with it validating a lot of what we thought was right, but also that some tactics we’d thought not worth playing do work out. Having a superhuman, free advisor has made improving much easier.

The negatives include that there’s less individual style amongst those that play like AIs, and also that it’s easier to cheat at the game.

As in chess, humans have been outclassed by computers in Go for years now, but that doesn’t stop us playing and enjoying it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

this is not debate club, and that sound you didn’t hear on account of your noise-cancelling headphones was you missing your stop

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 2.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 512

    Posts

  • 14K

    Comments

Community moderators