You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-2 points
*

@diamat this is only surprising if you approach #academia and #science with a positive bias instead of objectivity.

I have not seen an actually convincing quality control or publishing standard.

It’s all undocumented, learned behavior that gets approved or denied through unelected councils.

At least it’s not e.g. students or readers of papers who do the voting.

Not saying there aren’t good people doing good things. But the thing as a whole is incredibly and obviously shady.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Science

!science@lemmy.ml

Create post

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


Community stats

  • 749

    Monthly active users

  • 987

    Posts

  • 3.2K

    Comments

Community moderators