IT administrators are struggling to deal with the ongoing fallout from the faulty CrowdStrike update. One spoke to The Register to share what it is like at the coalface.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, the administrator, who is responsible for a fleet of devices, many of which are used within warehouses, told us: “It is very disturbing that a single AV update can take down more machines than a global denial of service attack. I know some businesses that have hundreds of machines down. For me, it was about 25 percent of our PCs and 10 percent of servers.”

He isn’t alone. An administrator on Reddit said 40 percent of servers were affected, along with 70 percent of client computers stuck in a bootloop, or approximately 1,000 endpoints.

Sadly, for our administrator, things are less than ideal.

Another Redditor posted: "They sent us a patch but it required we boot into safe mode.

"We can’t boot into safe mode because our BitLocker keys are stored inside of a service that we can’t login to because our AD is down.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
193 points

We can’t boot into safe mode because our BitLocker keys are stored inside of a service that we can’t login to because our AD is down.

Someone never tested their DR plans, if they even have them. Generally locking your keys inside the car is not a good idea.

permalink
report
reply
52 points

I remember a few career changes ago, I was a back room kid working for an MSP.

One day I get an email to build a computer for the company, cheap as hell. Basically just enough to boot Windows 7.

I was to build it, put it online long enough to get all of the drivers installed, and then set it up in the server room, as physically far away from any network ports as possible. IIRC I was even given an IO shield that physically covered the network port for after it updated.

It was our air-gapped encryption key backup.

I feel like that shitty company was somehow prepared for this better than some of these companies today. In fact, I wonder if that computer is still running somewhere and just saved someone’s ass.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

The good news is! This is a shake out test and they’re going to update those playbooks

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

Sysadmins are lucky it wasn’t malware this time. Next time could be a lot worse than just a kernel driver with a crash bug.

3rd party companies really shouldn’t have access to ship out kernel drivers to millions of computers like this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I wish you were right. I really wish you were. I don’t think you are. I’m not trying to be a contrarian but I don’t think for a large number of organizations that this is the case.

For what it’s worth I truly hope that I’m 100% incorrect and everybody learns from this bullshit but that may not be the case.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

The bad news is that the next incident will be something else they haven’t thought about

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

We also backup our bitlocker keys with our RMM solution for this very reason.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I hope that system doesn’t have any dependencies on the systems it’s protecting (auth, mfa).

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s outside the primary failure domain.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

I get storing bitlocker keys in AD, but as a net admin and not a server admin…what do you do with the DCs keys? USB storage in a sealed envelope in a safe (or at worst, locked file cabinet drawer in the IT managers office)?

Or do people forego running bitlocker on servers since encrypting data-at-rest can be compensated by physical security in the data center?

Or DCs run on SEDs?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

When I set it up at one company, the recovery keys were printed out and kept separately.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Paper never goes out of style …

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Paper print in a safe is what’s usual done.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You need at least two copies in two different places - places that will not burn down/explode/flood/collapse/be locked down by the police at the same time.

An enterprise is going to be commissioning new computers or reformatting existing ones at least once per day. This means the bitlocker key list would need printouts at least every day in two places.

Given the above, it’s easy to see that this process will fail from time to time, in ways like accicentally leaking a document with all these keys.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

They also don’t seem to have a process for testing updates like these…?

This seems like showing some really shitty testing practices at a ton of IT departments.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Apparently from what I was reading these are forced updates from Crowdstrike, you don’t have a choice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I’ve heard differently. But if it’s true, that should have been a non-starter for the product for exactly reasons like this. This is basic stuff.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Unfortunately, the pace of attack development doesn’t really give much time for testing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

More time that the zero time than companies appear to have invested here.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 538K

    Comments