9 points
I would also say that claiming it is “not an original” suggests that it’s a copy rather than not being the original carving.
14 points
13 points
They’re saying the head was replaced. Better phrasing would be that it is not in its original form.
3 points
Re-carved anyway, although I’d like to know what happened to all the original stone. You’d think we’d be able to find it. It’s a lot of stone based on that drawing.
7 points
If I drew a mustache on the Mona Lisa I think it’s fair to no longer call it an original.
2 points
1 point
