lemm.ee

22 points

4 months ago

It’s a bit unclear how any of what you’re proposing is supposed to help

report

stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub

[ - ]

-1 points

4 months ago

Problem: community is being flooded with content A which is diametrically opposed to a content B

Solution: flood content B

report

[ - ]

17 points

4 months ago

… your solution to spam is more spam?

report

stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub

[ - ]

-1 points

4 months ago

When getting the original spam taken down isn’t going to happen?

Absolutely, yes. Businesses respond to big problems and monetary problems, this is how you effect change.

report

[ - ]

3 points

4 months ago

Well, I do understand your logic at least even though I’m not exactly convinced about the mechanics.

Edit: non-native English speaker here, halp, “convinced about” or “convinced of”?

report

stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub

[ - ]

2 points

4 months ago

And i want to clarify I’m not saying spam shit posts, but spamming actual information, articles and actual good content is precisely an equivalent fight to combat flooding propaganda, and a pretty benign one at that when you look at more extreme gorilla tactics

report

DarkNightoftheSoul@mander.xyz

[ - ]

2 points

4 months ago

of is more common, but both are grammar.

report

[ - ]

1 point

4 months ago

Ah I somehow had the impression that there was some sort of subtle difference between convinced of/about. Thanks

report

Firefly7@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Show more comments

[ - ]

2 points

4 months ago

I think “convinced of” is more correct, but both phrases work. Could also say “convinced on”.

report