If you want the actual percentages, go by her own assessment:

"You know they say that all candidates are created equal, but you look at me and you look at Mar-A-Lago Don and you can see that statement is not true. See normally if you go one on one with another candidate, you got a 50/50 chance of winning. But I’m a judicial freak and I’m not normal. So he’s got a 25 percent, AT BEST, of beating me. Then you add RFK Jr. to the mix, your chances of winning drastic go down. See the three-way in the General Election, you got a 33 and a third chance of winning. But ME, I’ve got a 66 and two thirds chance of winning, cause RFK Jr. KNOWS he can’t beat me, and he’s not even gonna try. So Mar-A-Lago Don, you take your 33 and a third chance minus your 25 percent chance, and you got an eight and a third chance of winning in the General Election. But then you take my 75 percent chance of winning if we’s to go one on one, and then add 66 and two thirds percents, I’ve got a hundred and forty one and two thirds chance of winning in the General Election. See, Don, the numbers don’t lie, and they spell disaster for you in the General Election.

But I’m gonna break it down for all you lemmings. Would you rather be with me, or would you rather be with Don?

Well Republicans think Don’s kinda nice?

See, they’re some of those chuds who like fascism. Imma talk to all my freaks out there. Would you rather live in a nation with me at the helm, a judicial freak, to be satisfied every State of the Union, or live in a country with that fatass Mar-A-Lago Don? See, in the primary we’re gonna win, and I’m gonna be the next POTUS in the General Election. C’mon Petey, let’s go.

Hey, Kammy, just like you always say, ‘Kamala H has got your hook up?’ Well, South Bend Mayor Pete is who you need to look up, holla if ya hear THAT!"

Who am I to argue with the math?